BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//ceres.rub.de//events//
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-TIMEZONE:UTC
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Themenfeld 3
DTSTART:20111121T151500Z
DTEND:20111121T184500Z
DTSTAMP:20260525T124606Z
UID:TF3_211111_de-195@ceres.rub.de
CATEGORIES:
DESCRIPTION:Lexicographical Appraches to the Definition of Religious Langu
 ages.\nHow did past societies define what we today may call a religious la
 nguage? What kind of basic distinctions were made for defining a religious
  field? Which kind of concepts were used for defining religion? In modern 
 Western societies concepts like "transcendence"\, "god"\, "heaven"\, "chur
 ch" play an important role for defining the religious field\, often in con
 trast to concepts such as "immanence"\, "man"\, "earth" and "secular socie
 ty. Are there different or corresponding concepts in other cultures\, regi
 ons and periods of time? I should like to invite you to a summary of aspec
 ts and an exchange of semantic and conceptional approaches to define the r
 eligious field in each of your fields of research. It would be most welcom
 e\, if you could prepare a statement of about one page for this discussion
 .\nSecond Part:\nIn his lecture our colleague Prof. Michael  Weinrich will
  present the most prominent results of his recently  published study on "R
 eligion und Religionskritik". We should use the  chance to discuss them wi
 th him in the view of our  interest in the  comparative history of reli
 gion in early modern Europe.
URL:https://khk.ceres.rub.de/de/veranstaltungen/TF3_211111_de/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR